It's nothing revolutionary, but I've been working on it a long time finding just the right components..
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Coming soon...
I've been experimenting with some paint for my new project, I'm hoping to have all the parts soon, and then I'll get some semi professional pics of it.. but for now a sneak peek.

It's nothing revolutionary, but I've been working on it a long time finding just the right components..
It's nothing revolutionary, but I've been working on it a long time finding just the right components..
Friday, April 10, 2009
H.R. 450: Enumerated Powers Act
H.R. 450: Enumerated Powers Act
We need to ask our representatives why they are not on this list.
‘Each Act of Congress shall contain a concise and definite statement of the constitutional authority relied upon for the enactment of each portion of that Act. The failure to comply with this section shall give rise to a point of order in either House of Congress. The availability of this point of order does not affect any other available relief.’
Sponsor:
Cosponsors [as of 2009-03-07]
- Rep. Dean Heller [R-NV]
- Rep. Ronald Paul [R-TX]
- Rep. Paul Broun [R-GA]
- Rep. Michele Bachmann [R-MN]
- Rep. Brian Bilbray [R-CA]
- Rep. Michael Conaway [R-TX]
- Rep. Robert Goodlatte [R-VA]
- Rep. Scott Garrett [R-NJ]
- Rep. David Roe [R-TN]
- Rep. John Boozman [R-AR]
- Rep. Louis Gohmert [R-TX]
- Rep. Peter Hoekstra [R-MI]
- Rep. Rob Bishop [R-UT]
- Rep. Doug Lamborn [R-CO]
- Rep. Connie Mack [R-FL]
We need to ask our representatives why they are not on this list.
Viva La Revolucion!
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Auto deal working.. Politically?
In a story posted to Politico Here ,I saw the following
Everything these hacks do is politically motivated, they only care about increasing their own power, they don't care about anything but control over other people and lining their pockets.
On the other side of the aisle, Democrats — including some reluctant Michigan lawmakers — universally praised the Obama plan and heralded the GOP split as a sign that the auto deal was working, at least politically.Politically? I thought that they were just trying to save the economy, not somehow win political brownie points, isn't that what they tell us?
Everything these hacks do is politically motivated, they only care about increasing their own power, they don't care about anything but control over other people and lining their pockets.
Monday, March 30, 2009
Mouth Breathing Moron
In February 2009, Congressman Barney Frank, D-Mass., called for a reduction in the defense budget:


So if we cut 25% of $606.5B* we have $454.9B (rounding up) which is almost equal (439.2B) to the amount the US spent on Welfare and less than what just the Federal government spends on healthcare (672.3B). We just spent more money bailing out the banks than we spend on our National Defense.
Looking at it as a % of GDP we get around 4% which puts us around 27th among the worlds nations.
I think that mouth breather Barney Frank needs to STFU and if he wants to talk cutting spending perhaps he shouldn't be giving our money to his Campaign Donors**.
*606.5B is just what we spent on Military Defense and does not count the 35B in Foreign Military and Economic Aid or 83B in Veterans Benefits and Aid which is included in the pie chart as 'Defense' Spending
** A look at Barney's top contributors shows a huge majority of finance and insurance companies, and the individual donors list shows more of the same.
"The math is compelling: if we do not make reductions approximating 25 percent of the military budget starting fairly soon, it will be impossible to continue to fund an adequate level of domestic activity even with a repeal of Bush's tax cuts for the very wealthy. I am working with a variety of thoughtful analysts to show how we can make very substantial cuts in the military budget without in any way diminishing the security we need...[American] well-being is far more endangered by a proposal for substantial reductions in Medicare, Social Security or other important domestic areas than it would be by canceling weapons systems that have no justification from any threat we are likely to face."http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090302/frank
So if we cut 25% of $606.5B* we have $454.9B (rounding up) which is almost equal (439.2B) to the amount the US spent on Welfare and less than what just the Federal government spends on healthcare (672.3B). We just spent more money bailing out the banks than we spend on our National Defense.
Looking at it as a % of GDP we get around 4% which puts us around 27th among the worlds nations.
I think that mouth breather Barney Frank needs to STFU and if he wants to talk cutting spending perhaps he shouldn't be giving our money to his Campaign Donors**.
*606.5B is just what we spent on Military Defense and does not count the 35B in Foreign Military and Economic Aid or 83B in Veterans Benefits and Aid which is included in the pie chart as 'Defense' Spending
** A look at Barney's top contributors shows a huge majority of finance and insurance companies, and the individual donors list shows more of the same.
Saturday, March 28, 2009
A Republic, If we can take it back.
We need to reduce the power of the federal government.
No more, no less. We need to tell our Representatives that we will not stand for the further expansion of the Federal government. Our states need to take back their power.
Thanks to WRSA for bringing the video to my attention.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Follows is a transcript of a conversation I had via PM on a forum.
I think its a fine line we are all treading between Paranoia and Caution.
My response in regards to the "Tea Parties" going on and someone asking what they are worth..
Concerned: This has went out to all III here. I'm not posting it on ***********.
Me:This is from a blog in Aug 2007Quote:I've put alot of thought into the possible need for the use of force towards the government after all legal and constitutional avenues of redress have failed. Not every person would stand up at once to throw down the government, at least not at first. At first it would be individuals and small groups sabotaging operations and assassinating government officials. Some would be caught and others would not, but the government would start to crack down on everyone. The more arrests in the middle of the night, kangaroo courts, and people shot "Escaping" and the more people will be willing to act. With the internet and modern communications there is nothing to stop people from sharing intelligence and coordinating actions.
The hardware and software sides of the issue are easy, Firearms are plentiful, explosives are easy to make, and unbreakable encryption is easy. The hard part is personnel , as the ATF and FBI have shown. Every potential recruit is also a potential informer, the Resistance would not be one large force, but hundreds and thousands of unconnected cells formed of close friends and family members hiding among the population. Perhaps larger units could be formed but only when every single person knows that everyone else is trustworthy.
Concerned:Quote:I am concerned about this.Every potential recruit is also a potential informer, the Resistance would not be one large force, but hundreds and thousands of unconnected cells formed of close friends and family members hiding among the population. Perhaps larger units could be formed but only when every single person knows that everyone else is trustworthy.
Concerned: I know 12 here that I trust. They may know more. And you?
Me:I know 12 here that I trust. They may know more. And you?
4 maybe 5, but I am a paranoid.
I also tend to put more trust in people who have seen the elephant.Concerned wrote:Quote:I am concerned about this.Every potential recruit is also a potential informer, the Resistance would not be one large force, but hundreds and thousands of unconnected cells formed of close friends and family members hiding among the population. Perhaps larger units could be formed but only when every single person knows that everyone else is trustworthy.
There is nothing wrong with sharing information with others, as long as it is not of a tactical nature. Be careful of what you say and who you say it to and you should be okay, keep everything compartmentalized with no one person knowing more than a couple other people, and those not the same people. Keep information away from people you don't trust, and if you do trust them look closely just in case.
Don't allow criminals access to any organization at all. People breaking the law draw attention and are usually more than willing to turn states evidence. Don't be stupid and break laws from inattention, how many criminals have been caught not for the big things they did but for speeding?
I think its a fine line we are all treading between Paranoia and Caution.
My response in regards to the "Tea Parties" going on and someone asking what they are worth..
So what is the modern equivalent of crates full of tea?
If it's a legal "get a permit from the city hall" protest, it really wont draw any attention unless you are the KKK or the like.
If it's an illegal"let's go vandalize the governments tea by throwing it into the bay" protest, then the media may cover it but only insofar as pointing out how 'criminal' your actions were.
There's the catch 22, if you follow the rules then no one will make a stink of it, if you don't follow the rules then you get marginalized as a criminal.
Society is starting be like a glass of water thats been microwaved, it seems on the outside to seem safe and ok, but the second something disturbs it, it will explode burning whomever disturbed it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)